Evaluation for sudokn

Evaluator: Automated Evaluation

Evaluated on: 2026-01-06

⚠️ Automated Evaluation: This evaluation was generated automatically using an AI-based system. It is distinct from manual evaluations curated by human experts. Please review findings carefully and report any inaccuracies.

Evaluation Criteria: This evaluation uses the KG-Registry evaluation rubric as described in Cortes et al. (2025) . The rubric assesses knowledge graphs across multiple dimensions including access, provenance, documentation, maintenance, and fitness for purpose.


Access Level and Types

QuestionAnswerComment
Access to data outside of the knowledge graphYSPARQL endpoint at frink.apps.renci.org/sudokn/sparql provides query access to manufacturing capability data
API or online access to the knowledge graphNSPARQL endpoint available but no REST API or user-facing portal for non-expert access to manufacturing data
Multiple access options availableNSingle access mechanism via SPARQL; no web UI, bulk downloads, or alternative formats documented for SMM data
Source code availabilityNNo publicly available source code repository; KG construction methodology proprietary or undocumented
Downloadable knowledge graphNNo bulk RDF export or data download available; SPARQL endpoint only access method

Section Score: 1/5

Provenance of Nodes and Edges

QuestionAnswerComment
Source list providedYManufacturing data sources from SMM capability databases clearly identified in project documentation
Source versions informationNNo versioning information for upstream manufacturing data sources or SMM capability dataset snapshots
Import dependenciesYData integration pipeline documented showing how SMM capability data incorporated into knowledge network
Node and edge sourcesYManufacturing capabilities and supply-demand relationships traced to source SMM registry data
Edges deduplicationNNo documentation of deduplication strategy for redundant capability entries across SMM databases
Triples source detailsNRDF schema not formally documented; semantic mapping unclear for manufacturing relationships
Edge type schemaNRelationship types between capabilities and manufacturers not formally mapped to ontologies

Section Score: 3/7

Documented standards, schema, construction

QuestionAnswerComment
Biological usable dataYManufacturing capability data directly applicable to supply chain optimization and SMM network analysis
Resolvable IDsNNo external identifier mapping or resolvability documented; manufacturing IDs isolated to SUDOKN system
Construction documentationNKG construction methodology not formally documented; integration approach unclear
Transformation documentationNData transformation from SMM registry to knowledge network representation not transparent
Schema usedNManufacturing ontology or schema choices not published or documented

Section Score: 1/5

Update frequency and versioning

QuestionAnswerComment
Stable versionsNNo formal versioning scheme documented; SPARQL endpoint operates with continuous updates
Public tracker informationNNo public issue tracker or development roadmap visible; limited transparency into maintenance
Knowledge graph contact informationYFarhad Ameri (farhad.ameri@asu.edu) available as primary contact for SUDOKN project
Updated annuallyNUpdate frequency and schedule for manufacturing data not documented or formalized
Prior versions accessNNo version history or archived snapshots available for reproducibility

Section Score: 1/5

Evaluation - Metrics and Fitness for Purpose

QuestionAnswerComment
Use case providedYClear use case: interconnected network for SMM supply-demand matching and manufacturing capability discovery
Evaluation against other modelsNNo comparison with other supply chain or manufacturing knowledge graphs
Defined scopeYFocused scope on SMM manufacturing capabilities and supply-demand relationships
Multiple evaluation methodsNNo systematic validation framework for manufacturing data accuracy or completeness
Accuracy metricsNNo reported accuracy or reliability metrics for manufacturing capability information

Section Score: 2/5

License Information

QuestionAnswerComment
License