Evaluation for sldb

Evaluator: Automated Evaluation

Evaluated on: 2026-01-06

⚠️ Automated Evaluation: This evaluation was generated automatically using an AI-based system. It is distinct from manual evaluations curated by human experts. Please review findings carefully and report any inaccuracies.

Evaluation Criteria: This evaluation uses the KG-Registry evaluation rubric as described in Cortes et al. (2025) . The rubric assesses knowledge graphs across multiple dimensions including access, provenance, documentation, maintenance, and fitness for purpose.


Access Level and Types

QuestionAnswerComment
Access to data outside of the knowledge graphYAvailable through KGHub web portal at kghub.io/sldb/ for browsing synthetic lethal interaction data
API or online access to the knowledge graphNNo direct programmatic API interface; access primarily through KGHub web interface only
Multiple access options availableNWeb portal represents the single access method; no downloadable formats or alternative access mechanisms documented
Source code availabilityYComplete source code available at github.com/monarch-initiative/SLDBGen under Monarch Initiative organization
Downloadable knowledge graphNNo bulk download option available; users must query through web interface or reconstruct from source repositories

Section Score: 2/5

Provenance of Nodes and Edges

QuestionAnswerComment
Source list providedNSource data and dependency information not documented in publicly available README or documentation files
Source versions informationNNo version tracking for upstream synthetic lethal databases; unclear how frequently data sources are updated
Import dependenciesNETL pipeline and data dependencies not explicitly declared in source repository
Node and edge sourcesNNo documentation mapping synthetic lethal pairs to their primary research sources or evidence base
Edges deduplicationNNo documentation of deduplication strategies for redundant interactions across sources
Triples source detailsNNo RDF triples or semantic specifications documented for interaction relationships
Edge type schemaNSchema and relationship types for synthetic lethal interactions not formally documented

Section Score: 0/7

Documented standards, schema, construction

QuestionAnswerComment
Biological usable dataYSynthetic lethal gene pairs provide direct biological utility for drug target discovery and cancer therapeutics research
Resolvable IDsYNodes appear to use standard gene identifiers resolvable through Monarch Initiative and external databases
Construction documentationNNo formal documentation of KG construction methodology, data preprocessing steps, or quality control procedures
Transformation documentationNETL and data transformation steps not documented; unclear how raw data was processed into graph format
Schema usedNNo explicit schema documentation (RDF, Property Graph, or other formats); ontologies used are not specified

Section Score: 2/5

Update frequency and versioning

QuestionAnswerComment
Stable versionsYGitHub releases available at github.com/monarch-initiative/SLDBGen providing tagged stable versions
Public tracker informationYGitHub issues tracker available for bug reports and feature requests; active Monarch Initiative project
Knowledge graph contact informationYMaintainer contact available through GitHub (pnrobinson); Monarch Initiative maintains stewardship
Updated annuallyYGitHub repository shows recent commits and active maintenance; part of continuously updated KGHub ecosystem
Prior versions accessYFull version history available through GitHub releases and commit history for reproducibility

Section Score: 5/5

Evaluation - Metrics and Fitness for Purpose

QuestionAnswerComment
Use case providedYClear use cases: supports drug target discovery for cancer therapeutics by identifying essential gene pairs
Evaluation against other modelsNNo comparative benchmarking against other synthetic lethal databases or interaction prediction models documented
Defined scopeYFocused scope on synthetic lethal gene-gene interactions relevant to cell survival and drug sensitivity
Multiple evaluation methodsNNo systematic evaluation methodology or validation protocol published; lacks experimental validation metrics
Accuracy metricsNNo reported precision, recall, or F1 scores; no quantitative accuracy assessment available

Section Score: 2/5

License Information

QuestionAnswerComment
License